It is currently Fri 22. Nov 2024 19:10:19

All times are UTC + 1 hour





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Mon 20. Mar 2023 0:27:30 
Offline

Joined: Sat 26. Feb 2022 15:09:16
Posts: 69
Hello,
using this great protocol at 100Hz full resolution 8ch there aro no issues with Spirit 2 FBL. However, when switched to 333Hz (recommended for helicopters) packet rate at 8ch full resolution, the unit seems to have problems to handle the packet refresh rate speed. It freezes up and just stops working for couple of seconds. I have checked the receiver output with scope and it works as it should. There are no known issues with 333Hz at quad community so the prime suspect is the FBL. 333Hz packet rate has significantly better response on higher channels, especially ch6 for collective. When compared to FrSky, FlySky or Spektrum SRXL2 protocol, the CRSF is much better-smoother at 100Hz, and order of magnitude better with 333Hz, the only problem is that it doesn't work well. Is there going to be any update to this issue?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Mon 20. Mar 2023 8:44:47 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 29. Apr 2013 16:06:44
Posts: 12442
Hello,

is your receiver official TBS brand?
I dont know anything about your setup so we can't test it.

_________________
Spirit System developer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Mon 20. Mar 2023 19:46:40 
Offline

Joined: Sat 26. Feb 2022 15:09:16
Posts: 69
OK, no problem, here it is:
Transmitter TX16S with latest EdgeTX, Mode: CRSF, Baudrate: 1.87M (tried different baudrates but no difference) power: 100mW
BETA FPV 1W Micro TX, packet rate: 100Hz Full, Telemetry ratio: Std 1:32, 8CH
Matek receiver 2.4GHz R24-D, Telem: 100mW
Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Tue 21. Mar 2023 8:30:28 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon 29. Apr 2013 16:06:44
Posts: 12442
Thank you,
I am afraid we support just official receivers from TBS with official TBS CrossFire module.
If we will get such receiver we can add support for this too. This should be quite easy.

_________________
Spirit System developer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Tue 21. Mar 2023 21:35:48 
Offline

Joined: Sat 26. Feb 2022 15:09:16
Posts: 69
OK, I understand. Can you please confirm that this specific problem wouldn't arise with official TBS hardware running it at 333Hz? Thank you very much for your time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Thu 23. Mar 2023 18:50:57 
Offline

Joined: Mon 07. Feb 2022 19:35:40
Posts: 14
MegaHz wrote:
OK, I understand. Can you please confirm that this specific problem wouldn't arise with official TBS hardware running it at 333Hz? Thank you very much for your time.

I don't believe TBS Crossfire/Tracer will do 333hz. Just 250hz max with TBS Tracer at the moment.

ZeXx86 wrote:
Thank you,
I am afraid we support just official receivers from TBS with official TBS CrossFire module.
If we will get such receiver we can add support for this too. This should be quite easy.

It would be great if Spirit supported the ExpressLRS packet rates! It can go up to 1000hz, but 100hz and 333hz are the "full resolution" modes https://www.expresslrs.org/info/signal- ... dexes-rfmd

I'm sure you're already aware, but many manufacturers have started building and selling ExpressLRS hardware, including Radiomaster.

I would be using ELRS with my Spirit GT units, but I am staying with FrSky F.Port/FBUS for now for telemetry and integration :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Thu 23. Mar 2023 20:32:30 
Offline

Joined: Sat 26. Feb 2022 15:09:16
Posts: 69
rburrow87 wrote:
MegaHz wrote:
OK, I understand. Can you please confirm that this specific problem wouldn't arise with official TBS hardware running it at 333Hz? Thank you very much for your time.

I don't believe TBS Crossfire/Tracer will do 333hz. Just 250hz max with TBS Tracer at the moment.

ZeXx86 wrote:
Thank you,
I am afraid we support just official receivers from TBS with official TBS CrossFire module.
If we will get such receiver we can add support for this too. This should be quite easy.

It would be great if Spirit supported the ExpressLRS packet rates! It can go up to 1000hz, but 100hz and 333hz are the "full resolution" modes https://www.expresslrs.org/info/signal- ... dexes-rfmd

I'm sure you're already aware, but many manufacturers have started building and selling ExpressLRS hardware, including Radiomaster.

Quote:
I would be using ELRS with my Spirit GT units, but I am staying with FrSky F.Port/FBUS for now for telemetry and integration :)

I get it. It's convenient right now because of the integration capability with FrSky. But ELRS is new future, the signal quality on LoRa modulation is far beyond FrSky. It is Alfa Omega different. I just decommissioned all FrSky harware.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Tue 18. Jul 2023 19:46:23 
Offline

Joined: Sat 19. Sep 2015 8:03:47
Posts: 30
rburrow87 wrote:
I would be using ELRS with my Spirit GT units, but I am staying with FrSky F.Port/FBUS for now for telemetry and integration :)

I wonder if CRSF even is the best way forward for ELRS since it now supports both SBUS and SUMD. Unfortunately it doesn't support telemetry for either protocol yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CRSF packet rates
PostPosted: Wed 19. Jul 2023 9:53:24 
Offline

Joined: Fri 20. Aug 2021 6:12:26
Posts: 61
cycled wrote:
rburrow87 wrote:
I would be using ELRS with my Spirit GT units, but I am staying with FrSky F.Port/FBUS for now for telemetry and integration :)

I wonder if CRSF even is the best way forward for ELRS since it now supports both SBUS and SUMD. Unfortunately it doesn't support telemetry for either protocol yet.


SBUS is sh*t
CRSF packet rates are much higher.

All manufactures switched to protocols with much higher speed and integrated telemetry (SBUS2 and alike). So SBUS/SUMD are just the protocols with the highest compatibility not the best protocols. Also these old stuff cannot suport telemetry so thats why there was the need for S.Port


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 75 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  



Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
skymiles_red v1.0.1 designed by Team -Programming forum-سيارات للبيع .